requestId:68499ab6cec887.76741958.
Pathological analysis of Eastern Political Philosophy—Sample with “Fantasy Country” and “Livitan”
Author: Yao Zhongqiu (Teached by Shandong Confucian Advanced Research Institute)
Source: Author Author Authorized Confucianism Network, Original “Exploration and Contest” Issue 2, 2018
Time: Confucius was the first to be a member of the Wuxu Middle Spring Festival in the 2569th year of Confucius
Renzi
Jesus March 21, 2018
Content Summary:Based on the basic theory of “The Body Skin Care” in “The Filial Piety” has fatal shortcomings in Eastern political philosophy. By reading the two samples of “Fantasy” and “Livitan”, it is difficult to stand firm in the most basic preset: because the explanation of human nature, its natural state is complete or not; because only seeing adult men, the person they discuss is incomplete. This kind of political management theory that is established by deviating and establishing certainly lacks the order of shaping and maintaining the connection. Political philosophy requires a paradigm reaction, and rebuild the big government of political management theory with Confucianism.
Keywords:Oriental Political Philosophy; “Fantasy Country”; “Livitan”; Sucrates; Hobbes; Pathological Analysis
Oriental Political Philosophy is no longer aided medicine and is even passing away because it seems that it has no way to solve the diseases of modern politics, which are formed by itself. It can be seen that modern political philosophy has fatal shortcomings inherently. This political philosophy system built in the late modern era is consistent with its classical political philosophy. Therefore, this article will use “Fantasy Country” and “Livitan” as the script, which is based on Confucianism and briefly interprets the basic departments of Eastern political thinking. The two are the foundational works of Western political thinking in two eras. Understanding the two may be more a complete diagnosis of the pathology of Eastern political philosophy.
Pathological analysis of “Fantasy Country”
In Volume 2 of “Fantasy Country”, Su Crates turned to discuss the righteousness of the city-state. He trusted that the righteousness of the city-state had a “similar appearance” in individuals [1]. Plato also described this concept in other places: “A city-state with righteousness and governance coordination can be compared to a person with righteousness and self-discipline energy.” [2] Surprisingly, treating the city-state as a person, and then The city-state is a person, which is exactly what I think of when shaping the Qin system. The people said that the various countries in Huaxia always took the tribute and French style as their politics, but were often trapped in the process of being invincible. “When the military and barbarians are not indifferent, the superiors are pure and virtuous to meet the subordinates, and the subordinates are loyal and trustworthy to serve the superiors. The politics of a country is based on the governance of a whole body, and they do not know why they are governed. This is the governance of a true saint” (“History Records·Qin Benzi”). The Legalists designed the political system based on the political system of a country and the governance of one body. After that, Sucrates designed the city-state and also sought to be consistent and loyal to the city-state, that is, to make the city-state look like a person.
Then Sucrates previewed the upcoming dialogue: “We look at the birth of a city-state from the perspective of theory.” [3] Another way of interpretation is: “We observe the birth of a city-state in words.” [4] Later, Sucrates established a city-state through words, or a city-state from theory.
Use words to establish a city-state, and from theory to theory, it reveals the basic form of Eastern political philosophy for more than two thousand years. Political philosophy is a set of words, according to Sucrates’s later discussion, which comes from fools. The fool rose first, and thus gained truth about the city-state; then landed, expressed truth through words, and asked everyone to build the city-state. The Unitarianism, which formed another source of Western spiritual life, also highlighted the creativity of the Word. His God can speak, and he creates all things and people with his words. The Century Book says: “At the beginning, God created the six union. The earth is empty and chaotic, and the surface is dark. God’s spirit moves on the water. God said that if there is light, there will be light. When God sees light is good, he divides light and darkness. God calls light the hour, and darkness the night. There is morning and early morning, and this is the beginning of the day.” God’s words, so there are prophets who convey God’s words to others; the prophets use God’s name to ask for people, to standardize and lead people in their words, and the organization of Hebrew society is inherited by the prophets.
It can be seen that Eastern political philosophy, or 年后 More generally, Western people’s perception of politics is not practical, not knowledge but action, but knowledge has its own origins. It trusts that there is perfect politics in the other world, and fools can recognize it through evidence, and this knowledge is true knowledge; the method of prophets in the religion of God is simpler and listen to God’s revelation. Truth must be expressed in words. The effectiveness of fools is to express political truth through words, and their mission is presented as artificial language, that is, artificial theory system. Therefore, for more than two thousand years, the speech about politics, that is, the political philosophy theory system is undeniable. The “Fantasy Country” and “Livitan” analyzed in this article are the foundational works of the two eras.
Let’s look at Sucrates’s comments博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网官网博官网官网博官网官网官网博官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官�West. “After confirming this point, Sucrates said, “Come, let us start from the theoretical point of view to creating a city-state from the beginning; but what specifically creates it seems to be our material needs. ”[5]
The word “from the head” is worth noting. If a fool settles in reality, he will not be able to “create a city-state from the head”, and can only slightly improve it. But the fool is to establish a city-state by speaking, and of course he can completely and without the reality of a city-state, and from the state of no city-state, this is “from the head”; and only in this way can he deviate from all the realities of a city-state and gain true insights about the city-state.
But the fool is Bao Webmaster Although life is in a real city-state, it is necessary to “start from the beginning” and you cannot create a beginning for yourself; for this, The order of real city-states is not enough to understand, and the elements that can create fantasy politics are found in its ruins; and these elements are used to construct the city-states with words. The task of the fool begins with the solution. The fool believes that she hopes that her companion can accompany her and take care of the family, but Chen Jubai is in charge, to solve the practical and important words or theoretical aspects of the theory. City-state is the truth about city-state. Words and theory are closer to the absolute good than reality.
What is the basic element that forms a city-state after Sucrates’ solution? Sucrates said that it is the preservation needs of people, and in particular its material needs. Here, people are materialized. Next, Sucrates also said that the reason why people need each other is because each life is different, which is of course a fact; but Sucrates’s next recommendation is absurd: a person does a professional, that is, a creation or technology that is allowed to serve others. [6] Thus, people become the carrier of technology. Confucius said: “A right person is not a tool. “(“Speech·心变官网”) Sucrates made people a weapon, which destined that Sucrates’ education could not be able to be fully grown because people have been materialized.
It can also be estimated that Sucrates’s mind who constructed a city-state is adults, because only adults can express their needs and have skills; he determined the two existence attributes of human beings: material needs and a professional skill. Obviously, any real city-state cannot be enough for adults, and why can a person only have one technology? The existence of human beings In terms of happiness, is technology the most important? To go further, we must wonder, can such a clumsy person establish a noble city-state?
In addition, Sucrates said that the dynamic driving of material demand allows people to build a city-state, and this city-state has been materialized – a city-state is nothing more than a complete mechanism to meet people’s m
發佈留言